In the morning, the Asia-Pacific stock market generally fell, but A shares once rose against the trend. I thought I would take an independent market, but I didn't expect it to be brought down at noon.Recently, there have been a lot of monster stocks because the index has set up a theme to sing opera. However, if the index can't continue to build up here, the theme of singing opera is also at risk of flameout. Therefore, there is an urgent need for stagflation blue chips to come out, but because blue chips are institutional tickets, in the final analysis, it depends on whether institutions can strengthen their confidence.Moreover, the liquidity is very good. The daily turnover is 7 billion, which is still T+0. There is no stamp duty. You can withdraw at any time to copy stocks, and you can hide in it to eat solid income. This year, it has also increased by 7%.
Among the national debt and political debt, I chose the only political bond ETF in the two cities. Although the debt base is very safe and the risk is very small, the latter has a short duration compared with 30 years, and the short-term withdrawal is even smaller due to the negative impact. In addition, the government debt itself is also a "quasi-national debt", because of the credit risk compensation, it has a higher yield and a higher cost performance than the national debt.Well, I want to say that it is no wonder that we can only make money by looking at A shares in such a mechanical and rigid way. After all, these big V's can't make money by entering the stock market, but they will be cut off.His judgment is based on insufficient quantity. When the turnover of 2W billion was maintained in November, A shares barely rebounded by 3500 once. At present, the turnover has been kept below 2W billion, so 3400 points is the top.
Therefore, the logic of Liu Changsong's bearish position is wrong. I am also cautious in this position, but the reason why I am cautious is that the theme stocks are too hot and the blue chips have been stagnating, so there is a problem of switching market styles, not whether the market will fall. Because of the recent stagflation of blue chips, there is no momentum for the market to fall.Among the national debt and political debt, I chose the only political bond ETF in the two cities. Although the debt base is very safe and the risk is very small, the latter has a short duration compared with 30 years, and the short-term withdrawal is even smaller due to the negative impact. In addition, the government debt itself is also a "quasi-national debt", because of the credit risk compensation, it has a higher yield and a higher cost performance than the national debt.Well, I want to say that it is no wonder that we can only make money by looking at A shares in such a mechanical and rigid way. After all, these big V's can't make money by entering the stock market, but they will be cut off.
Strategy guide
Strategy guide
12-13
Strategy guide
12-13